BuffEnough : Buff, Debuff, Spell : World of Warcraft AddOns

(279 Kb)

Download

Updated: 12-11-11 08:33 PM

Add Favorite

Install Help

Pictures

File Info

Updated:	12-11-11 08:33 PM
Created:	unknown
Downloads:	10,586
Favorites:	145
MD5:

BuffEnough Popular! (More than 5000 hits)

Version: 1.2.130-1

by: neotron, nikkodemus

--About--

BuffEnough is a personal buff monitor that answers the simple question 'Am I buff enough?' If you're like me, when a raid leader does a ready check, you go through a mental checklist as you look over your buffs and gear, to make sure that you really are ready. Did I remember to do my own buff, do I have all pally blessings, do I have the correct pet out, am I still flasked/elixired, is my durability okay, did I forget to take off my riding crop, etc, etc. This is what BuffEnough does for you. It scans the raid to figure out what you should have, and then scans your buffs and gear to figure out what you do have. If the box is green, the answer is 'yes', you're buff enough. If the box is red or yellow, then you're still missing something and hovering your mouse over the box will tell you what it is in the tooltip.

--Commands--
/be or /buffenough - brings up the command line list
/be config - brings up the config UI (can also be accessed by Blizzard's interface options)

1.2.128:
- Toc bump.
- Fix for combat log event change.
-

1.2.124:

- Fixed issue with Dalaran Brilliance not working.
- Added Soul Link to warlock buff list.
- Don't ask for thrown weapon poison for rogues with 3/3 in Vile Poisons.
- Dark intent is annoying. Only tracking it while in a party.

1.2.121:
- Track thrown weapon buffs for rogues.
- Removed handling of the 'shattrah' flasks - two expansions away is far enough. :)
- Removed Dark Intent tracking on pet when solo since it keeps falling off.
- Fixed Dark Intent tracking to only count for self cast buff (in case another caster buffs you with it).
- Add Commanding Shout as valid health buff (it overrides imp buff) and added the fort and drums of wild scrolls as valid health/4% buffs.
- Added Flask of Enhancement support - it counts as a flask even though it's more a 'profession parity' ability.

1.2.116:
- Added support for Dark Intent for Warlocks (since I kept forgetting it!)

1.2.114:
- Seems like I forgot to fix up warriors. Fixed now.
- Added check for missing DK presence and moonkin forms.
- Added support for pet buffs - Fel Intelligence, Blood Pack, Qiraji Fortitude and Embrace of the Shale Spider.
- Added some more non-approved items (Christmas outfits, cooking hat, fishing hats).

1.2.110:
- Fixed issue preventing the display from being resized.

1.2.108:
Many 4.0 related updates. Most notably:
- Removed special Blessings handling (they are now ordinary raid wide buffs)
- Fixed MotW/BoK handling.
- Removed lots of non-existing buffs.
- Added Shadowform and Aspect of the Fox support.
- And more.

r1.1.14
- added ruRU translation
- fix the LDB type field
- fix a few blessing priorities
- clean up some unused locales
- clean up some debugging

r1.1.13
- expect BoK from all pallies
- expect PoS from all priests
- change flask duration to 1 hour

r1.1.12
- bump toc

Optional Files (0)

Archived Files (7)

File Name	Version	Size	Author	Date
BuffEnough	1.2.128	278kB	neotron	04-27-11 12:41 AM
BuffEnough	1.2.124	278kB	neotron	02-10-11 11:09 PM
BuffEnough	1.2.121	275kB	neotron	12-31-10 02:19 AM
BuffEnough	1.2.116	275kB	neotron	12-17-10 12:39 AM
BuffEnough	1.2.114	274kB	neotron	12-01-10 02:18 AM
BuffEnough	1.2.110	269kB	neotron	11-28-10 02:43 AM
BuffEnough	1.2.108	269kB	neotron	11-27-10 11:24 PM

Comment Options

Page 3 of 10

Last »

12-31-08, 12:22 PM
Aquentvp A Murloc Raider Forum posts: 6 File comments: 12 Uploads: 0	wow - this sounds like a great idea, and I'd love to use it, but it doesn't seem to work properly for me (I'm assuming because I don't know how to configure it properly). Perhaps someone could educate me? I'm a lock, and I'd like to be notified when any of these buffs aren't active while in a raid: - Fel Armor - Grand Spellstone (weapon buff) - ANY flask (Flask of the Frost Wyrm specifically) - ANY food buff (Smoked Salmon or Snapper Extreme, specifically) Right now, I don't have a flask, and I don't have a food buff, yet BE isn't reporting either as missing. Can I correct this?

12-24-08, 02:52 PM
Zidomo A Cliff Giant Forum posts: 76 File comments: 1052 Uploads: 0	This is missing detection of a BC-era flask, even though its listed in the mod's Spells.lua file: Flask of Chromatic Wonder. v1.1.6, WoW 3.0.3 live, USEng client/server. With that flask active on a character, the LDB display tooltip (via StatBlockCore) still states that "Flask/elixirs" are missing. Click to do an update, it still doesn't see it. The character the flask was being used on, though, has the Mixology passive alchemy skill (new in WotLK). That skill increases flask durations from two hours to four. It also increases the amount of stat bonuses given by the flask (if you can make it, which this character can). Might have something to do with the issue.

12-19-08, 02:37 AM
nikkodemus A Defias Bandit Forum posts: 2 File comments: 69 Uploads: 5	Yep, that's an issue with a few of the buffs that don't stack. I'll try to get a fix for that soon. In the meantime, you can configure overrides to ignore the buffs that you know you won't need.

12-19-08, 02:25 AM
Logiar A Defias Bandit Forum posts: 2 File comments: 5 Uploads: 0	BuffEnough keeps moaning about needing buffs that does not stack with eacother anymore, like blessing of might and battleshout.

11-30-08, 04:52 PM
nikkodemus A Defias Bandit Forum posts: 2 File comments: 69 Uploads: 5	Gotcha, thanks. Newest version should work.

11-30-08, 04:16 PM
Hjalte A Fallenroot Satyr Forum posts: 21 File comments: 49 Uploads: 0	He's talking about this spell, which mages learn from a tome bought in Dalaran: http://www.wowhead.com/?spell=61024 I'd like to see support for it as well. It does exactly the same as the max rank of Arcane Brilliance.

11-29-08, 10:36 PM
nikkodemus A Defias Bandit Forum posts: 2 File comments: 69 Uploads: 5	Sure, can you provide a wowhead link or something? Not sure I know what you're talking about off the top of my head.

11-29-08, 10:33 PM
Codex A Deviate Faerie Dragon Forum posts: 19 File comments: 281 Uploads: 21	Can you add support for dalaran int/brilliance?

08-19-08, 12:17 PM
nikkodemus A Defias Bandit Forum posts: 2 File comments: 69 Uploads: 5	Uploaded a first pass at a WotLK-beta-compatible version here.

07-25-08, 10:20 PM
nikkodemus A Defias Bandit Forum posts: 2 File comments: 69 Uploads: 5	Actually, I came up with a better solution, so I reverted the previous change. Hopefully that should fix the issue for all classes that have mappable self-buffs.

07-25-08, 06:58 PM

Mooshroom

A Murloc Raider

Forum posts: 5

File comments: 20

Uploads: 0

Originally posted by nikkodemus
For all classes, there are certainly always cases where it makes more sense to do something other than the "normal" buff set up. Hopefully the custom buff check capability + the profile capability makes that easy enough to manage. There was a bug with how BE was detecting and reporting shaman shields and not an obvious fix for it, so I settled on checking for the "base" case.

In WotLK, the "Static Shock" talent makes it so that Lightning Shield will be the standard choice for enh shamans, at which point I'll make it a talent-specific check.

That makes sense

Just sort of annoys me when we start pulling Brutallus and my BuffEnough shows me a red window because i have LShield up and not watershield.

This is not really a big deal, but on the other hand it defeats the purpose of only glimpsing at the corner of my UI to see if i am fully buffed (in this case, have SOME elemental shield up). Now i always have to mouseover and check if something really important is missing.

Still, this is a great mod which makes raiding quite a bit easier for me, so thank you for that (certain paladins that i spam with buff requests might disagree here).

07-25-08, 05:31 PM
nikkodemus A Defias Bandit Forum posts: 2 File comments: 69 Uploads: 5	For all classes, there are certainly always cases where it makes more sense to do something other than the "normal" buff set up. Hopefully the custom buff check capability + the profile capability makes that easy enough to manage. There was a bug with how BE was detecting and reporting shaman shields and not an obvious fix for it, so I settled on checking for the "base" case. In WotLK, the "Static Shock" talent makes it so that Lightning Shield will be the standard choice for enh shamans, at which point I'll make it a talent-specific check.

07-25-08, 04:10 PM
Mooshroom A Murloc Raider Forum posts: 5 File comments: 20 Uploads: 0	Code: r79106 - change shamans to check explicitly for water shield Might want to reconsider that change - In WotLK shamans get various benefits from having lightning shield up. (last beta patch notes i checked anyway, where is MY beta invite Blizzard!?) - Being an elemental shaman with tons of spelldamage, on some raids having lightning shield up is actually more beneficial than having silly watershield up, especially on DPS races (hello Brutallus) with a shadowpriests in your caster groups where mana regen is not what you worry about anyway. 2300 free damage > being at full mana when then enrage timer hits

07-25-08, 02:36 PM

Spinhalf

A Defias Bandit

Forum posts: 2

File comments: 47

Uploads: 0

Originally posted by nikkodemus
The text that you enter for the buff name needs to be exact, with correct capitalization and punctuation. Other than that, it should be straightforward. What specifically is going wrong?

BE doesn't see the buff. I've got the spelling correct - even cut and pasted from the combat log just to be sure. I've tried it with quotes and with out. Should I try underscores for the spaces maybe?

Edit: Typed in by hand and switched it to buff from consumable and all is working now. Thx

Last edited by Spinhalf : 07-25-08 at 02:46 PM.

07-25-08, 12:23 PM
nikkodemus A Defias Bandit Forum posts: 2 File comments: 69 Uploads: 5	The text that you enter for the buff name needs to be exact, with correct capitalization and punctuation. Other than that, it should be straightforward. What specifically is going wrong?

Page 3 of 10

Last »

Report this File

Category Jump: