| Updated: | 06-08-08 07:12 AM |
| Created: | unknown |
| Downloads: | 197,346 |
| Favorites: | 328 |
| MD5: |

![]() |
Comment Options |
|
|
|
|
A Kobold Labourer
Forum posts: 0
File comments: 150
Uploads: 0
|
There is a modded ItemRackFu that does work with this version of ItemRack.
I'm using the version Imaram posted here (but it's an attachment so you might have to login to download it from wowace forums). Works without problems for me in 2.4 too. http://www.wowace.com/forums/index.php?topic=5357.0
Last edited by Buio : 06-21-08 at 11:55 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A Defias Bandit
Forum posts: 2
File comments: 8
Uploads: 0
|
ItemRackFu
Any chance of itemRackFu (fubar support) being added?
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Re: Re: Re: About the events...
That said, I'm confident the next update will be 2.2 with events unless some emergency bug pops up. |
||
|
|
|
|
||
|
A Kobold Labourer
Forum posts: 0
File comments: 1
Uploads: 0
|
Re: Re: About the events...
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
A Wyrmkin Dreamwalker
Forum posts: 57
File comments: 96
Uploads: 0
|
Re: About the events...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A Kobold Labourer
Forum posts: 1
File comments: 21
Uploads: 0
|
Umm.. I see that the ItemRack DOES still have the Events Tab...
And the old version at http://wow.curse.com/downloads/details/1482/ does support events. Yet I wouldn't want to give up the Queue options ^_^ Any chance of talking to that Author and combining the two versions? I mean - if the old version does work with events, then surely this one can, right? ^_^; |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah it's not a true checkbox, click it a few times you'll see it has three states (ignore, show, hide). If you want *all* helms hidden then you need do nothing other than make sure it's off in the game's interface options as usual.
It becomes a pain when you want maybe 1-2 shown and the rest hidden. I have a monocle, santa's hat and couple resist hats (like iceguard) that are too hilarious to hide, but it was a pain going through all 15-20 sets and putting an X beside them all. I'll likely add a per-item setting instead of per set in a button in the options scroll. So you can say I want all helms hidden, these are exceptions. But as I said that's a low priority for now. |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
A Wyrmkin Dreamwalker
Forum posts: 57
File comments: 96
Uploads: 0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
A Cobalt Mageweaver
Forum posts: 232
File comments: 260
Uploads: 0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A Wyrmkin Dreamwalker
Forum posts: 57
File comments: 96
Uploads: 0
|
Ok, I did try it with 2.15, same problem with the belts. It is not shown in character screen or itemrack menu for building a set.
If I equip it from my bag, make a new set, it works (switches to it) with no problem. |
|
|
|
|
||
|
A Wyrmkin Dreamwalker
Forum posts: 57
File comments: 96
Uploads: 0
|
I'm going to try it out tonight with 2.15 to see if the problem is still there. 1. enGB 2. Found the Problem with 2.13. I have 2.15 but did not try it 3. Sure, I can equip it manually from my bags. It does not appear in the character selection if I press Alt and it shows all my (3-4) belts. And it does not appear in the Item Rack Windows for creating a set. Again, I have to try this with 2.15 just to be sure. 4. Did not try this. I only use Bank for Resistance Set Items 5. I have 4 x 20 Bags + Backpack. Zul Aman Quest Bag, Magisters Terace Drop Bag and 2 created Bags. I use Baggins as a Mod, so I don't know where a item is really stored 6. CowTips + Auctioneer for Tooltips 7. I have 4-5 Belts. All but one show. Same goes for other item slots, but for belt I do remember because I switch them often vor Single Tanking / AoE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A Deviate Faerie Dragon
Forum posts: 10
File comments: 5
Uploads: 1
|
Gello it's great to have you back! You are truly a warrior's best friend.
Quick question - you made a simple and dynamite mod called Autorack back in the day. Any plans to revive it? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
A Kobold Labourer
Forum posts: 0
File comments: 13
Uploads: 0
|
Thanks for a nice mod
I do have one remark to bank store feature. It will store stuff that's part of the set even if another set uses it, even if that other set is not stored. It will even remove the parts of the set that's currently being worn if they are part of the set that's being stored. I'm not sure how hard would be to add checks to see if parts of the set being stored are in a set that's still in inventory and then ignore those bits. But even just ignoring the set that's currently equipped would be nice. |
|
|
![]() |