![]() |
Quote:
I had to close a popup advertisement to read the above post. When I did, the word virus had been underlined and turned green as an obvious hyperlink. I hovered over it to preview, and the link said, I swear to God: Worth to see! Viruses at low prices. Compare online! I don't believe in omens... but the irony is too much to bear. Quote:
And keep your advertising minimally obtrusive. Please. If you want to consider yourself a business, even if the goal is not to make profit, then you must consider your customer (end user) first. Have you no customer service experience? You don't win by complaining about what the competition is doing, you win by providing something better than them. People use WowMatrix because it is far superior to what you offer, at least in the minds of the uncounted masses who aren't going to read these forums or post here, let alone give a damn about your lost bandwith. Come on, guys. Do your secret nerd power handshake, pop some popcorn and watch Pirates of Silicon Valley, roll 3d8, or whatever it takes to pump yourselves up, go out there and BEAT the competition. Your smarmy celebration that it's someone else QQing about WowMatrix instead of you won't last long. Look, I work in an industry that has yet to figure out what it's going to do about networks losing advertising revenue (or at least advertisers losing effectiveness) due to DVR use. I'm not saying you guys are wrong (though the better arguments seem to be coming from the one-posters, and "/click da button" arguments aren't convincing to anyone who would choose to use WowMatrix), but two wrongs don't make a right. Though they do make a profit, usually. Three notes: First, you will never convince anybody that hasn't already bought in to your point of view that your timing wasn't carefully chosen to cause maximum drama. You were perfectly within your rights... just don't act like it was any less juvenile than it was. Second, I don't remember where I read it in the haze of staying up too late reading hundreds of posts to threads, but one of the developers tried to accuse WowMatrix of inflicting users with "unnecessary" updates??? Please, try harder. Third, I've just updated one of my three "essential" addons with WowMatrix. Game on! |
Bollocks... BOLLocks... bollOCKS... ya know what? I like it too... I think I'm gonna use it all the time now! Thanks again!
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
Oh .. Adblock Plus ... script removal and flash block. Hrmm .. there goes that theory. I'd happily pay money towards wowmatrix, but wowinterface and its variants? .. no way, its been horrible to use since Everquest. Provide good services you get buisness. Wowmatrix does just that. Nice way to pidgeon hole yourselves tho. |
Quote:
|
I find the arguments against WM to be a wee bit two-faced.
On the one hand you say "ZOMG they were stealing our content and hosting it themselves" and then you say "but we made them stop and now their stealing our bandwidth instead." I'd written a mod or two in my day, and had them hosted on one or both sites. I don't recall giving over sole ownership of the programs, much less rights to make revenue off them, when I did so. Perhaps I should read your fine print more carefully in the future? I'd much rather see a CPAN-ish model for these things... make a library of mods with a good index, and then mirror it to any and all that want to spare the bandwidth, so no single site is stuck paying the bill. But, I guess that's against the real issue here: your making a profit off the code of others. |
Quote:
I have been trying to work it into my everyday conversations but I keep failing.[/quote] I'm gonna use it here a lot, and practice vocally in front of my bathroom mirror. It's hard for us yanks to get the correct inflection... Bollocki, bollockum, bollockus... I came, I saw, I bollocksed... |
Quote:
|
Quote:
You people would blame WoWI and Curse if they closed down due to WM leeching bandwidth. |
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
As for ad revenue. Anybody that understands the nature of the internet and business models, economics (I'm not expert, but I understand) knows that ad revenue is one of the worst business models around. Sure, you can get lucky with it and make some money off it, but as users find more and more ways to block ads or just ways to ignore them in general, it'll fall. Ad-revenue based business models are destined to fail. The only question is when. So complaining about taking away ad-revenue is the same thing as saying "I'm not smart enough to think of a better business model, yet." |
Quote:
|
Quote:
The stance of the admins here has been stated clearly. People need to stop confusing the authors that choose to only host here with the admins of the site. As for making a profit off others. Hosting a site takes money to cover costs. This is a fact. People should stop assuming that the need to cover costs is the same as making a profit. Quote:
No author is under contract or obligation to host here. The ones that do choose to do so for their own reasons which i will not guess at. People are hung up on it being about making a profit. Its simple. If the sites cant cover costs (and the increased bandwidth cause by WM) then they shut down. End of story. Full stop. All gone, BYE BYE! and the program ceases to work. Its basic logic. If your costs far exceed your gains long enough you are out of business. And anyone or anything trying to piggyback on it is SoL. |
Quote:
|
WoWI was never able to get a response from WM. Curse was, and WM offered forth a tiny fraction of what their bandwidth was costing. It never went any father, so WoWI and Curse looked into other solutions. This is what they found.
The viability or not of an ad-based model is rather moot now, thanks to Blizzard's new addon policy. Addons must be free to download, so that basically leaves ad-based, donation based, and premium services beyond the free downloads. If WoWI only gave their updater to paying users do you think that could cover the rest of the bandwidth bill? I doubt it personally. Ad-based plus premium may work, and we'll see where that goes with Curse's updater. The other thing you're neglecting though is that WoWI (and EQI) were able to sustain themselves on an ad-based model for a long time before WM came along. |
Quote:
Quote:
As for your tripe about ad revenue being a bad business model, it seems to work ok for Google. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I know EQI and WoWI has done it for a while now. I was quite acting during EQInterface's initial startup days. I even wrote tutorials (which are far outdated and no longer wrking) for EQ's interface. |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:31 PM. |
vBulletin © 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd
© 2004 - 2022 MMOUI